Cross-covenant civil-society monitoring of Taiwan government discourse on CEDAW, CRC, and CRPD. https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/atom.xml 2026-05-07T01:22:24Z CC BY 4.0 Tri-Covenant Editorial weall888@gmail.com https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/ build_rss_feed.py https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/tri-covenant-shadow-report.html 2026-05-07T12:00:00Z 2026-05-07T12:00:00Z

示範如何把三公約共構平台的 6 結構性發現 + 17 國際 benchmark + 7 案例文,組裝為一份 UN treaty body 聯合提交。6 個 finding 章節各附事實 / 結構性意涵 / 對政府訴求 / 對應 UN GR-GC + PI 連結。6 個 annex 連結機讀資料下載。CC BY 4.0,各 NGO 可下載 HTML 改填具體審查週期作為自家提交起點。 [EN] A worked example showing how to assemble Tri-Covenant Watch's 6 structural findings + 17 international benchmarks + 7 case studies into one joint UN treaty-body submission. Each of 6 finding sections has facts / structural meaning / asks to government / mapped UN GR-GC + PI link. 6 annexes link machine-readable data downloads. CC BY 4.0 — NGOs can download HTML, fill in their review cycle, and use as a starting point. 中文 / Chinese: https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/tri-covenant-shadow-report.html English: https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/tri-covenant-shadow-report-en.html

https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/international-benchmarks.html 2026-05-06T12:00:00Z 2026-05-06T12:00:00Z

合併 7 篇案例文中所有 EU FRA 34% / UN Women 2-4× / 澳洲 NDIS / 加拿大 PALS / 紐西蘭 Whaikaha / CRPD GC-3 / CEDAW GR-39 / CRC GC-22 對照數字成一張可排序、可篩選、可全文搜尋的表。17 列 = 17 個可被引用的對照點,每列附國際源 + 台灣對應數字 + gap + PI 連結 + 原始檔 URL。UN reviewer / 學者 / 記者一目瞭然台灣與國際標準的差距。 [EN] Consolidates every international benchmark cited across our 7 case studies into one sortable / filterable / searchable table — EU FRA 34% / UN Women 2-4× / Australia NDIS / Canada PALS / NZ Whaikaha / CRPD GC-3 / CEDAW GR-39 / CRC GC-22. 17 rows; each pairs an international reference with Taiwan's actual government-document count, the gap, the mapped PI, and a raw-source URL. 中文 / Chinese: https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/international-benchmarks.html English: https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/international-benchmarks-en.html

https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/press-kit.html 2026-05-06T12:00:00Z 2026-05-06T12:00:00Z

給記者的 1 頁紙快查:每段 ≤80 字,引用 ≥3 個來源(政府/學術/國際),內附國際對照(EU FRA 34% / UN Women 2-4× / 澳洲 NDIS / 紐西蘭 Whaikaha)+ 台灣政府文件實際數字。6 結構性發現 + 1 方法論補完 = 7 個可複製貼上的段落。CC BY 4.0 開放轉載,每段附原始檔 URL。對應 boilerplate / 採訪聯絡 / 引用建議格式。 [EN] A one-page quick-reference for journalists: each paragraph ≤80 words, cites ≥3 sources (gov/academic/international), pairs an international benchmark (EU FRA 34% / UN Women 2-4× / Australia NDIS / NZ Whaikaha) with Taiwan's actual government-document count. 6 structural findings + 1 methodology coda = 7 copy-paste paragraphs. CC BY 4.0 — free to reproduce, with raw-source URLs. 中文 / Chinese: https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/press-kit.html English: https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/press-kit-en.html

https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/blog/2026-05-06-platform-self-audit.html 2026-05-06T12:00:00Z 2026-05-06T12:00:00Z

六篇結構性發現案例文之後的方法論補完。三共約監督平台量化政府沉默,也量化自己沉默。link_audit 工具讓 dead_anchor 從 88 降至 50(43% 修復率),三項關鍵修復:CRPD 102 頁 #main 缺失補回 / CEDAW 模板移除 / 首頁 4 個隱形錨點。第七項指標(平台健康度)正式進入月度追蹤,目標 2027-Q1 歸零。結構性批判,須以結構性自律為前提。 [EN] Methodology coda following the six structural-findings case studies. Tri-Covenant Watch quantifies government silence — and now quantifies its own. The link_audit tool drove dead_anchor from 88 to 50 (43% repair rate) via three key fixes: CRPD 102-page #main backfill / CEDAW template removal / 4 invisible homepage anchors. A 7th indicator (Platform Health) joins the monthly tracker with target zero by 2027-Q1. Structural critique requires structural self-discipline. 中文 / Chinese: https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/blog/2026-05-06-platform-self-audit.html English: https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/blog/2026-05-06-platform-self-audit-en.html

https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/blog/2026-05-06-lgbtqi-children-low-everywhere.html 2026-05-06T12:00:00Z 2026-05-06T12:00:00Z

「6 結構性發現深入剖析」系列完結篇。LGBTQI+ 兒少在嚴格交集下三公約合計 3 段(CEDAW 2 / CRC 1 / CRPD 0)。CRC GC-22 已明確要求,但台灣兒少政府文件未承擔。三個原因:政治敏感繞道走 / 性平機制承擔 SOGIESC 整體 / CRC NGO 內部張力。結構模式總結:「該主張的人,沒有人主張」。對應 PI-14 + PI-18。 [EN] Final piece in the "6 findings deep-dive" series. Under strict intersection: 3 segments total (CEDAW 2 / CRC 1 / CRPD 0). CRC GC-22 explicitly mandates protection but Taiwan children's docs don't carry it. Three reasons: political sensitivity detour / gender-equality machinery absorbing SOGIESC / internal NGO tension. Structural pattern summary: "those who should claim, no one claims." Mapped to PI-14 + PI-18. 中文 / Chinese: https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/blog/2026-05-06-lgbtqi-children-low-everywhere.html English: https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/blog/2026-05-06-lgbtqi-children-low-everywhere-en.html

https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/blog/2026-05-06-sogiesc-cedaw-concentration.html 2026-05-06T12:00:00Z 2026-05-06T12:00:00Z

深入剖析跨公約共構平台第四項結構性發現:SOGIESC 在 CEDAW 1,403 段、CRC 362 段、CRPD 0 段。婦女框架承擔 75% SOGIESC 論述,身障框架完全缺席。四個解釋(軸四主動追蹤 / 性平機制壟斷 / CRC 政治敏感 / CRPD 缺 LGBTQI+ 倡議者)。關鍵代價:身障 LGBTQI+ 三層全掉。對應 PI-18 + CRC PI-14。 [EN] Deep-dive into the 4th structural finding: SOGIESC discourse — CEDAW 1,403 / CRC 362 / CRPD 0. Women's framework carries 75% of all gender-identity discussion; disability framework entirely absent. Four hypotheses; critical cost: disabled LGBTQI+ erased across all three systems. Mapped to PI-18 + CRC PI-14. 中文 / Chinese: https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/blog/2026-05-06-sogiesc-cedaw-concentration.html English: https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/blog/2026-05-06-sogiesc-cedaw-concentration-en.html

https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/blog/2026-05-06-disabled-women-violence.html 2026-05-06T12:00:00Z 2026-05-06T12:00:00Z

深入剖析跨公約共構平台第一 + 第二項結構性發現:身障女性 0 段、家暴 1 段。國際對照:🇪🇺 FRA 34% / 🇺🇳 UN Women 2-4× / 🇦🇺 2×。台灣推估規模 17 萬人次,但政府身障論述零段。CRPD §6+§16 + CEDAW GR-19/35 + GR-39 共識下的論述空缺。對應 PI-17。 [EN] Deep-dive into the 1st + 2nd structural findings: disabled women 0, DV 1. International benchmarks: 🇪🇺 EU FRA 34% / 🇺🇳 UN 2-4× / 🇦🇺 2×. Estimated 170,000 cases in Taiwan, zero segments in disability discourse. CRPD §6+§16 + CEDAW GR-19/35 + GR-39 obligations all unmet. Mapped to PI-17. 中文 / Chinese: https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/blog/2026-05-06-disabled-women-violence.html English: https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/blog/2026-05-06-disabled-women-violence-en.html

https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/blog/2026-05-06-disabled-indigenous.html 2026-05-06T12:00:00Z 2026-05-06T12:00:00Z

深入剖析跨公約共構平台第五項結構性發現:身障原住民三公約合計 1 段。澳洲 NDIS 1.4×、加拿大 PALS 2×、紐西蘭 Whaikaha 部專責部會。台灣什麼時候啟動?CEDAW GR-39 §54-58 已要求三維交叉統計、文化適切服務、DPO 代表權、傳統領域勞動可及性 — 4 項對政府訴求 + 對應 PI-19。 [EN] Deep-dive into the 5th structural finding: disabled indigenous mentioned 1 time across all 3 covenants. Australia NDIS 1.4×, Canada PALS 2×, NZ Whaikaha dedicated ministry. When does Taiwan start? CEDAW GR-39 §54-58 requires three-way disaggregation, culturally appropriate services, DPO representation, traditional-territory labor accessibility — 4 government asks + mapped to PI-19. 中文 / Chinese: https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/blog/2026-05-06-disabled-indigenous.html English: https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/blog/2026-05-06-disabled-indigenous-en.html

https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/blog/2026-05-06-reasonable-accommodation-paradox.html 2026-05-06T12:00:00Z 2026-05-06T12:00:00Z

深入剖析跨公約共構平台第三項結構性發現:CRPD §2 招牌概念在身障文件密度反低於 CEDAW / CRC。三個假設、一個可能解釋(「行政流程」階段而非「權利論述」階段)、四項具體行動 + 對應 PI-12。 [EN] Deep-dive into the 3rd structural finding: CRPD's flagship concept density is LOWER in disability documents than in women's or children's. Three hypotheses, one likely explanation ("administrative-process" phase, not yet "rights-discourse" phase), four concrete actions + mapped to PI-12. 中文 / Chinese: https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/blog/2026-05-06-reasonable-accommodation-paradox.html English: https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/blog/2026-05-06-reasonable-accommodation-paradox-en.html

https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/blog/2026-05-06-government-silence.html 2026-05-06T12:00:00Z 2026-05-06T12:00:00Z

Tri-Covenant Watch 首份對外案例文發布。三個 NGO 三年來爬下 102,728 段政府文件,交叉比對發現 6 個結構性盲點:身障女性 0 段、家暴 1 段、合理調整 7 段。中英文同步,適合媒體轉載與 UN 委員會引用。 [EN] First Tri-Covenant Watch case study. After 3 years of cross-referencing 102,728 government-document segments, 6 structural blind spots emerged: disabled women 0, DV in CRPD 1, reasonable accommodation paradox 7 vs 173 vs 100. 中文 / Chinese: https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/blog/2026-05-06-government-silence.html English: https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/blog/2026-05-06-government-silence-en.html

https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/tri-covenant-about.html 2026-05-05T12:00:00Z 2026-05-05T12:00:00Z

235 行 step-by-step 對外複製指南。其他 NGO 可用此架構複製到任何 UN 公約監督。涵蓋 schema 設計、bootstrap 流程、replication checklist。 [EN] 235-line replication guide for other NGOs. Architecture, schema, 7-step bootstrap, replication checklist. 中文 / Chinese: https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/tri-covenant-about.html English: https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/tri-covenant-about-en.html

https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/tri-covenant-about.html 2026-05-05T12:00:00Z 2026-05-05T12:00:00Z

完整對外文件:三平台主辦 NGO 介紹、4 階段方法論、PI 5 維評分公式、開放資料政策、引用建議格式、CC BY 4.0。 [EN] Full outward-facing about page: NGO hosting, 4-step methodology, PI 5-dim scoring, open data policy, citation, CC BY 4.0. 中文 / Chinese: https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/tri-covenant-about.html English: https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/tri-covenant-about-en.html

https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/structural-findings.html 2026-05-05T12:00:00Z 2026-05-05T12:00:00Z

一頁總覽 6 個跨公約結構性發現,每張卡含 3 平台 bar chart、嚴重度分級、對應 PI chip、國際 GR/CO 引用。列印友善。 [EN] One-page dashboard of 6 cross-covenant structural findings. Each card has 3-platform bar chart, severity grade, mapped PI chips, GR/CO citations. Print-friendly. 中文 / Chinese: https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/structural-findings.html English: https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/structural-findings-en.html

https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/issues/PI-17.html 2026-05-05T12:00:00Z 2026-05-05T12:00:00Z

CRPD 平台補三個跨公約交織盲點 PI:身障女性受暴(PI-17)、身障 LGBTQI+(PI-18)、身障原住民(PI-19)。三者皆 0 政府文件命中,但這正是「結構性失語」的量化證據。 [EN] Three intersectional blind-spot PIs added to CRPD: disabled women DV (PI-17), disabled LGBTQI+ (PI-18), disabled indigenous (PI-19). All score 0 segments — this is itself the quantified evidence of structural silence. 中文 / Chinese: https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/issues/PI-17.html English: https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/issues/PI-17-en.html

https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/executive-summary.html 2026-05-05T12:00:00Z 2026-05-05T12:00:00Z

適合給立委 / 媒體 / UN 審查者快速簡報。三平台覆蓋 + 6 結構性發現 + 32 PI 分布 + 4 項 UN 訴求,A4 一頁列印。 [EN] Concise brief for legislators / media / UN reviewers. 3-platform coverage + 6 structural findings + PI distribution + 4 UN asks, A4 single-page printable. 中文 / Chinese: https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/executive-summary.html English: https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/executive-summary-en.html

https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/monthly-trend.html 2026-05-05T12:00:00Z 2026-05-05T12:00:00Z

建立 monthly_snapshots.json append-only 一月一筆架構,每月初自動更新。對外展示「平台是活的」。baseline 2026-05:102,728 段。 [EN] Append-only monthly snapshot infrastructure, auto-refreshing on the 1st. Demonstrates the platform is alive. Baseline 2026-05: 102,728 segments. 中文 / Chinese: https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/monthly-trend.html English: https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/monthly-trend-en.html

https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/cross-platform-en.html 2026-05-05T12:00:00Z 2026-05-05T12:00:00Z

Tri-Covenant Dashboard、Tour、Executive Summary、PI Scorecard、Intersectional、Coverage Diagnosis、Keywords、Frequency、Search、D-grade Research TODO 全部英文版。 [EN] Tri-Covenant Dashboard, Tour, Executive Summary, PI Scorecard, Intersectional, Coverage Diagnosis, Keywords, Frequency, Search, D-grade Research TODO — all in English. 中文 / Chinese: https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/cross-platform-en.html English: https://cedaw.taiwanmommies.org/cross-platform-en.html