兒少人權監督平台

來源 PDF: 34_20230628105510_2535778.pdf

民間團體就兒權公約第二次國際審查影子報告

高雄市家長協會 2022/3/30

所涉CRC條次:

兒童權利公約第二次國家報告條約專要文件第 226 點

洪志和

0932-747-889

Email：kcpataipei@gmail.com

本報告不公開

 目 錄

所涉CRC條次…………………………………………………………3

主題……………………………………………………………………….3

現況…………………………………………………….………………….3

問題分析…………………………………………….….……………….4

建議……………………………………………………….……………….5

教育部性別平等教育師資人才庫講師的服務單位 與

臺灣臺北地方法院 108 年秩抗字第 20 號刑事裁定書內

點名:並沒有禁止年輕人使用毒品的團體，是同一個團體。

………………………………………………………………………………7

教育部性別平等教育季刊

文章內容倡議性解放的意識型態，

甚至暗示學生或教師應要接納

多元且不利健康的性行為形式。

……………………………………………………………………………….8

2

 民間團體報告

高雄市家長協會

涉及公約及條文:

兒童權利公約第二次國家報告條約專要文件

第 226 點：學校實施之性教育及生育保健內容：

(b) 《108 課綱》明定學校課程設計應適切融入「性別平等教育」等議題，包含生

理 性別、性傾向、性別特質與對性別認同多樣性的尊重，得因地區特性、學生特

質與需求，選擇或編輯合適教材。

主題/

官方性平師資人才徵選及性平季刋內容問題～恐危害青少年性健康！

現況/

1.教育部「性別平等教育師資人才庫」

(https://www.gender.edu.tw/web/index.php/m6/m6_01_index)

2.有多位講師之所屬之民間團體為「沒有禁止年輕人使用毒品」的團體（請見附

件：臺灣臺北地方法院 108 年秩抗字第 20 號刑事裁定書）。

3.教育部性別平等教育季刊

文章內容倡議性解放的意識型態，甚至暗示學生或教師應要接納多元且不利

健康的性行為形式。

3

問題分析/

1.教育部「性別平等教育師資人才庫」的部分講師及其所屬民間團體所倡議的教

學理念或舉辦的講座內容嚴重違反性別平等教育的價值及真義，並且對於同

志族群愛滋防治有嚴重不良影響• 。這些劣質師資及團體主張未成年兒少性

解放以及對特殊性行為或毒品持開放鼓吹立場（例如約砲、戀童癖、用藥性

愛、娛樂性用藥、派對用藥、開放式關係與多重伴侶、BDSM 皮繩愉虐等）

（見附註1）。這些團體或個人之主張並不符合性別平等教育，而且可能嚴

重誤導並危害兒少的健康。

2.台灣的年輕族群得到愛滋病兩大主因為「網路交友」和「藥物性愛趴」，但是

此類講師及其所屬民間團體卻是教導網路約砲和娛樂派對用藥性愛(見附

註？)，家長擔心，有可能因這些講師入校宣導、兒少會被誘導認同並參加

上述各項不良活動，進而危害兒少之健全身心健康發展、家庭與社會治安。

3.性別平等教育季刊乃教育部的官方刊物，避免倡議不利健康之意識型態的文

章，（附註4）以免誤導老師，進而影響青少年。

官方「教育」季刊應符合「教育」專業理念，提供正確客觀的知識，

以推動性別平等教育為核心目標，然而，其中有多篇文章倡議性解放

的意識型態，不但沒有提供老師充分正確性醫學相關知識的文章，甚

至暗示老師要接納多元且不利健康的性行為形式，其內容嚴重誤導老

師，無法幫助老師建立正確的性觀念。此類內容已經嚴重偏離性別平

等教育之目的，編輯群應該好好檢討。

4

建議/

1.教育部對於性別平等師資延攬推薦應該訂定教育理念審核標準，以過濾一些理

念不符合教育的個人或團體，以免使得性別平等師資人才庫成為校園教育潛

在危害。性別平等師資人才庫應排除那些倡議或是不明確禁止「約砲、戀童

癖、用藥性愛、娛樂性用藥、派對用藥、開放式關係與多重伴侶、BDSM 皮

繩愉虐」等的團體或個人。

2.這些倡議理念違反我國法律及兒少身心健全發展的團體或個人，除了不應列進

性別平等師資人才庫且應列為警示名單，以防幼教補習班誤攬聘用，教育部

或地方政府相關教育會議也應避免邀請這些團體或個人作為諮詢委員。

3.教育部「性別平等教育委員會」應增加家長席次至五席，即各學級(幼兒園、國

小、國中、高中、高職)各一名家長委員，其子女必須具備該學籍在學身分；

推薦該家長委員之家長團體，必須有 1/4 以上理監事及 1/2 會員均身為體制

內在學學生之家長。以確保家長得以參與監督性平教育之執行。政府召開與

本提案(性別平等教育)相關會議及研商會議時，應邀請提案團體及得有 1/4

以上理監事及 1/2 會員均身為體制內在學學生家長之家長團體參與會議，並

應提前三周公告於網站之外及確實聯繫各團體會議時間。

4.教育部「性別平等教育季刊」主編及編輯群應回歸以「教育」專業為核心， 並

編輯群應包括「性教育」、「衛生教育」、「健康教育」、「情感教育」、

「大腦科學與認知發展」等專業的專家，並應經過公正、公開之機制遴選聘

任。

5

附件/

2017年疾管署年輕族群愛滋防治核心教材P25

(統計數據至2017年11月)

6

▲ 教育部性別平等教育師資人才庫講師的服務單位與

臺灣臺北地方法院 108 年秩抗字第 20 號刑事裁定書內

點名:並沒有禁止年輕人使用毒品的團體，是同一個團

體。

臺灣臺北地方法院刑事裁定三次判決書字號如下，分別為

中華民國 108 年度店秩字第 72 號、

中華民國 108 年度店秩字第 86 號、

中華民國 108 年度秩抗字第 20 號。

：

臺灣臺北地方法院 108 年度秩抗字第 20 號刑事裁定

https://law.judicial.gov.tw/FJUD/data.aspx?ty=JD&id=TPDM,108%2c%e

7%a7%a9%e6%8a%97%2c20%2c20191106%2c1

某團體也同時經營某網站…為”熱線男同志性愉悅性教

育網站”…稱二三級毒品為『娛樂性藥物』、『派對藥

物』（party drug）…並宣導只要善盡該注意的地方就

可以幫助嗑藥者降低風險、保護自己安全，雖該協會為

迴避法律責任，宣稱並沒有鼓勵嗑藥，但網站內容根本

沒有阻止年輕人使用毒品，例如寫『身體狀況好的時候

才用，是讓自己能夠比較high，又可避免危險的方

7

法。』而且還詳細羅列了二三級毒品的用法及使用感

受」等內容。

㈢經原審依職權調查本案文章所提網站，自某團體網站下方「友善連結」處，可

連結至「熱線男同志性愉悅性教育」網站（即「爽歪歪 SongYY」網站），而游標

移至該網站首頁上方「性愛達人」選項會出現下拉式選單，其第 5 個選項為「三

溫暖、轟趴與派對藥物」，將游標移至該選項，會出現「前進同志三溫暖」、

「關於用藥重要提醒」、「派對藥物簡介」、「ES (用藥性愛)新手必讀」、「轟

趴注意事項」等 5 個選單。其中，「派對藥物簡介」文章所列之藥物包含 E

（Ecstasy、MDMA）、K 他命、威而鋼、大麻、Rush、黑貓、5-meo、GHB、

煙（甲基安非他命）等，並說明服用上開藥物之反應及注意事項等情，有網頁

瀏覽畫面截圖及網頁列印資料附卷可稽。

而經本院於本審依職權調查某網站，目前該網站首頁固已無顯示

「熱線男同志性愉悅性教育」網站之連結，然於被移送人撰寫本案文章時，某網

站之首頁應確實有「熱線男同志性愉悅性教育」網站之連結，此有上開附卷資料

足憑，是於本案文章撰寫之時空下，網路使用者得輕易自某網站連結至「熱線男

同志性愉悅性教育」網站，並得接觸、閱覽該網站首頁上方「性愛達人」選項下

包含「派對藥物」（包含為我國毒品危害防制條例所列之第二級毒品（如

MDMA、大麻、甲基安非他命）及第三級毒品（如 K 他命））、「轟趴」等內

容，足可認定。

8

▲ 教育部性別平等教育季刊

文章內容倡議性解放的意識型態，甚至暗示學生或教師

應要接納多元且不利健康的性行為形式。

例:NO.74學生懷孕事件面面觀--修.pdf (gender.edu.tw)第74期

p.108-109

文章內容節錄:

…此外,面對陌生的性文化,如情趣用品、性愉虐(BDSM)、戀

物、人獸交、跨代戀等⋯家長和教師在急著舉「反對」牌,或貼

上「性解放」污名標籤就把他們打入谷底之前,是否也可以先暫

停,深呼吸一下?先秉持著增廣見聞的求知慾好心,搜尋一下科學

報導或讀些社會文化研究書籍,嘗試理解為什麼有些次文化社群

會跟自己有不一樣的性實踐?性對這些次文化實踐者的生命有

何意義?她/他們是怎麼發展情慾、協商性關係以達成認同跟生

活平衡的?

9

NO.74學生懷孕事件面面觀--修.pdf (gender.edu.tw)第74期p.108-109

10

來源 PDF: 34_20230628105525_3145507.pdf

Second National Report to the

Convention on the Rights of the Child

CRC articles involved:

Point 226 of the Treaty-specific Document for the Second National

Report of the Convention on the Rights of the Child

This report is closed to the public

Shadow Report by civil organization

Association of Parents in Kaoshiung

洪志和

0932-747-889

Email：kcpataipei@gmail.com

 Table of Contents

Article of Treaty or Act involved :………………………………………3

Subject：……………………………………………………………………3

Current Situation ：……………………………………………………3

Problem Analysis：…………………………………………………….4

Suggestions:………………………………………………………………6

Appendix:…………………………………………………………………..9

Taiwan's Taipei District Court's 108-year Rank Zi No. 20

Criminal Ruling clearly states that a certain group does

not "prohibit young people from using drugs", but in

the Ministry of Education's gender equality education

teacher talent pool, some lecturers' service units are

actually this group! (filed as ruling No. 20 in Social

Order Maintenance Act related cases 2019) ………11

The Gender Equality Education Quarterly is an official

publication of the Ministry of Education.

However, many articles from this journal advocate

ideology of sexual liberation, even encourage

teachers/students to embrace diverse and unhealthy

forms of sexual behavior………………………………………13

2

 Report by Civil Organization

Association of Parents in Kaoshiung

Article of Treaty or Act involved :

Point 226 of the Treaty-specific Document for the Second

National Report of the Convention on the Rights of the Child

Subject：

Concerns have resulted from biased recruitment of Gender

Equality Education Lecturers and improper content in the

official Gender Equality Education Quarterly Journal. Sexual

health of our children/youth can be greatly endangered!

Current Situation ：

1. The following link is the “talent pool” of Sexual Equality

Education lecturers provided by Ministry of Education

（MOE）

(https://www.gender.edu.tw/web/index.php/m6/m6_01_index)

Quite a few lecturers from the above talent pool actually

come from organizations or NGOs that do not ban young

drug users (See Appendix : Ruling No. 20 in Criminal Ruling

of violation of Social Order Maintenance Act, sentanced by

Taipei District Court in 2019)

3

 2. Gender Equality Education Quarterly Journal published by

Ministry of Education

Articles in these journals regularly promote ideology of

sexual liberation, implying that students or teachers should

embrace diverse and unhealthy forms of sexual behavior.

Problem Analysis：

1. Some lecturers, and the organizations they are affiliated

with, recommended by the so-called Gender Equality

Education talent pool advocate ideology and sexual

behavior that are contradictory to the core values of

Gender Equality Education, the very ethos they claim to

uphold. These ill-meaning and under-qualified

lecturers/organizations promote sexual liberation among

children/youth, encourage unnatural sexual behavior

and/or drug use （ such as random one-night affair,

paedophilia, drug sex, recreational drug, party drug,

open relationship, Polyamory, BDSM, etc.) (See Appendix

1). Their teaching not only has significantly deviated from

the essence of Gender Equality Education, but also misled

many children/youth and destroyed their health,

especially in the area of AIDS prevention within the gay

community.

4

2. "Online dating" and "drug sex party" are the two major

channels through which young population in Taiwan

contracts AIDS. And yet the above-mentioned Gender

Equality Education lecturers/organizations ARE the main

source of teaching of online dating and recreational

drugs (see Appendix ?). Many parents are extremely

concerned that, by allowing these lecturers to propagate

these toxic teaching on campus, children/youth will be

induced to identify with the ideology and participate in

the above-mentioned dangerous activities. There is no

doubt that not only the physical/mental health and safety

of the young generation are at risk, but the population as

a whole, is also greatly endangered.

3. The Gender Equality Education Quarterly is an official

publication of the Ministry of Education, which should be

in line with the concept of education profession, to

provide correct and objective knowledge, and to

promote gender equality education as its core goal.

However, many articles from The Gender Equality

Education Quarterly not only withhold proper medical

knowledge from teachers, but even deliberately and

seriously mislead teachers, and their teenage students,

into believing that they should embrace diverse and

unhealthy forms of sexual behavior (See Appendix 4).

5

 4. We condemn such grave deviation from the core value

of gender equality education, and demand that the

editorial team start a review process immediately and the

misconduct never repeated.

Suggestions:

1. When it comes to recruitment or recommendation of

Gender Equality Education lecturers, the Ministry of

Education should set stricter standards to filter out those

individuals/organizations that have deviated from the

core value of Gender Equality Education so they

themselves won’t become potential hazard on the

campus. In other words, the Gender Equality Education

talent pool should exclude those

individuals/organizations that advocate or are

deliberately vague on "random one-night affair,

paedophilia, drug sex, recreational drug, party drug,

open relationship, Polyamory, BDSM (Bondage &

Discipline ， Dominance & Submission ， Sadism &

Masochism，)leather rope abuse, etc.".

6

2. The above-mentioned individuals/organizations not

only shouldn’t be included in the governmental Gender

Equality Education talent pool，they should even be

listed on a Gender Equality Education WARNING list so

cram schools for children wouldn’t hire them out of

ignorance. And, of course, Ministry of Education or local

governments should also avoid consulting them at all

cost.

3. To ensure that parents can participate in monitoring the

execution of the Gender Equality Education ， MOE’s

"Gender Equality Education Committee" should increase

its committee seats to include 5 parents.

(1) with one parent from each school level (namely

kindergarten, elementary school, junior high school,

high school and technical school）

(2) with each parent having at lease one child currently

enrolled in that particular school level.

(3) with the committee-member-recommending

organizations having at least 1/4 of its board

members and 1/2 of its members parents of that

particular public school level themselves.

7

 (4) When the government convenes for

research/consultation meetings related to any

proposals involving Gender Equality Education, it

should post the meeting agenda 3 weeks ahead of

time on official website and invite the following

parties to participate in the meeting the proposing

organization parent advocate groups which have at

least 1/4 of its board members and 1/2 of its

members parents of that particular public school

level themselves.

4. The editor-in-chief and editorial group of the "Gender

Equality Education Quarterly" of the Ministry of

Education should refocus on the core of "education"

profession. The editorial group should comprise experts

on "sex education", "hygiene education", "health

education", "emotional education", "brain science and

cognitive development" and other professions. And the

appointment of these editors should go through fair and

open mechanism.

8

Appendix:

◼ Online dating and drug sex have become the main causes

of infection in young people

◼ 70% homosexuals have found sexual partners through the

internet

◼ 53% homosexuals have had sex with internet friends in the

past 3 months

◼ 41% of unprotected sex has been performed with internet

friends

◼ Research on homosexual online dating culture

commissioned by CDC shows that the proportion of illegal

drugs used in publicly solicited sex without condoms is as

high as 85% 9

 ◼ Epidemic data show that the use of illegal drugs among gay

AIDS patients has increased from 8.4% in 2010 to 14.54% in

2012

◼ The prevalence of drug abuse among students is 1% to 1.7%.

The number of Ketamine users has increased by 6 times in

10 years. The proportion of AIDS patients using illegal drugs

is as high as 19%. Many times poor students exchange sex

for illegal drugs or admissions to bar parties and are even

more susceptible to AIDS when they are under the influence

of drugs and unable to resist unprotected sex.

CDC Core Curriculum on HIV/AIDS Prevention and Control

for Young people p. 25 (statistics as of November 2017)

10

▲ According to the following 3 rulings sentenced by the

Taipei District Court of Taiwan

◼ Ruling No. 72 in violation of Social Order Maintenance Act,

in 2019

◼ Ruling No. 86 in violation of Social Order Maintenance Act,

in 2019

◼ Ruling No. 20 in violation of Social Order Maintenance Act,

in 2019

Taiwan's Taipei District Court's 108-year Rank Zi No. 20

Criminal Ruling clearly states that a certain group

does not "prohibit young people from using drugs",

but in the Ministry of Education's gender equality

education teacher talent pool, some lecturers' service

units are actually this group! (filed as ruling No. 20 in

Social Order Maintenance Act related cases 2019)

Ruling No. 20 in Social Order Maintenance Act related

cases in 2019 by Taipei District Court of Taiwan

https://law.judicial.gov.tw/FJUD/data.aspx?ty=JD&

id=TPDM,108%2c%e7%a7%a9%e6%8a%97%2c20%2c20191106%

2c1

At the same time, Taiwan XX Association also operates the

“Song YY” website, dedicated to “educate” gays who call in

more ways to enjoy sex. They label grade II and III drugs as

"recreational drugs" or "party drugs" and advocate that, as

long as precautions are taken, drug risk can be reduced and

11

 drug users safe. Even though that Association does not

explicitly “encourage” young people to use drugs, to avoid

legal liability, its website has gone into great lengths to

instruct young people using wording such as, "Using it when

you are healthy is a way to make yourself happier and avoid

danger."It has also detailed the usage and expected

experience of grade II and III drugs.

From the website " Taiwan Tongzhi Hotline Association " ,

one can link first to “Hotline for Gay Sexual Pleasure

Education" website (i.e., the "Song YY" website) and then

"Sauna, Sex Party and Party Drugs" via its drop-down menu.

Under "Sauna, Sex Party and Party Drugs", 5 options are

further listed entitled, “Introduction to Homosexual Sauna",

“Reminders to Drug Usage", "Introduction to Party Drugs”,

“ES (Medication Sex) 101" and "Precautions for Sex Parties".

The following substances are listed under “Introduction to

Party Drugs”, which are : E (Ecstasy, MDMA), Ketamine,

Viagra, Cannabis, Rush, Black Cat, 5-meo, GHB and tobacco

(Methamphetamine) etc., all coming with detailed

explanations of their respective reactions and precautions.

Snapshots and printouts from these websites are attached

for review.

According to the Taipei District Court's ruling, although

the "Gay Sex Education Hotline" website can no longer

be linked to the "Taiwan Tongzhi Hotline Association",

the link still existed at the time of the court's ruling.

12

 The fact that the above-mentioned fact that young people

are not prohibited from using drugs has also been

confirmed by the courts.

▲ The Gender Equality Education Quarterly is an official

publication of the Ministry of Education.

However, many articles from this journal advocate

ideology of sexual liberation, even encourage

teachers/students to embrace diverse and unhealthy

forms of sexual behavior

“Aspects of Cases of Student Pregnancy” - .pdf (gender.edu.tw) No. 74，

pp. 108-109

Excerpt from the article: ...

When facing unfamiliar sexual cultures, such as sex toys,

BDSM, sexual fetishism, bestiality, intergenerational love,

etc., why can’t the parents and teachers pause and take a

deep breath, before rushing to judge those who practice

such behavior or to label such behavior as "sexual

liberation"? They should first be curious, using this

opportunity to broaden their knowledge, searching for

related scientific reports or socio-cultural research books,

and try to understand why some Asian cultural subculture

communities have different sexual practices from their own.

What does “sex” mean to those subcultural practitioners?

How do they develop lust and negotiate sexual relationships

to fulfill their identity and thus live a balanced life?

13

“Aspects of Cases of Student Pregnancy” - .pdf (gender.edu.tw) No. 74，

pp. 108

https://www.gender.edu.tw/web/upload/society/Magazine/NO.74%E5%A

D%B8%E7%94%9F%E6%87%B7%E5%AD%95%E4%BA%8B%E4%BB%B6%E9%9D%A2%

E9%9D%A2%E8%A7%80--%E4%BF%AE.pdf

14

“Aspects of Cases of Student Pregnancy” - .pdf (gender.edu.tw) No. 74，

pp. 109

https://www.gender.edu.tw/web/upload/society/Magazine/NO.74%E5%A

D%B8%E7%94%9F%E6%87%B7%E5%AD%95%E4%BA%8B%E4%BB%B6%E9%9D%A2%

E9%9D%A2%E8%A7%80--%E4%BF%AE.pdf

15