📅 時間軸
-
2009-03[影子報告提交] 🔵 擴張派婦女新知 第 1 次 CEDAW 民間影子報告發起者: 婦女新知基金會主張將 LGBTI 議題納入 CEDAW 詮釋
-
2014-06[影子報告提交] 🔵 擴張派婦女新知 第 2 次 CEDAW 民間影子報告發起者: 婦女新知基金會主張 LBTI 婦女應為 CEDAW 保護對象
-
2017[政策建議書] ❓ 不明勞動部 性別工作平等法施行細則修正(納入「性別認同」歧視)發起者: 勞動部 (MOL)勞動部解釋令將「性別認同」納入性別歧視保護
-
2017-01[政策建議書] 🔵 擴張派婦女新知等 共同推動性平綱領納入多元性別章節發起者: 婦女新知基金會推動性平綱領加入多元性別議題章節
-
2017-01-03[政策建議書] 🔵 擴張派行政院性平處 性別平等政策綱領 v4 發布發起者: 行政院性別平等處SOGIESC 用語占婦女相關用語 8.1%(本平台 Wave 19 解析)
-
2017-01-03📜 [政策綱領修訂] 🔴 軸四擴張行政院性別平等政策綱領 第 4 版(106 年修正)正式納入多元性別章節機關: GEC從 255 項行動修訂為 221 項,並加多元性別議題;SOGIESC 用語占婦女相關用語 8.1%(本平台 Wave 19 解析)
-
2018[政策建議書] 🟠 反擴張派AABE 國教盟 反對性平教育課綱多元性別內容發起者: 國教行動聯盟健康教育主軸,反對性別運動主導性平教育
-
2018-07[影子報告提交] 🔵 擴張派多 NGO 第 3 次 CEDAW 民間平行報告(共 11 NGO)發起者: 婦女新知基金會聯合主張 LBTI 婦女多重歧視應納入
-
2019-03-08[政策建議書] 🟠 反擴張派WHRC Declaration on Women's Sex-Based Rights 全球連署啟動發起者: WHRC 婦女人權運動(國際)sex-based rights 國際立場聲明,9 條對應 CEDAW + 婦女空間 + 體育 + 兒童醫療
-
2022-04[影子報告提交] 🔵 擴張派婦女新知 第 4 次 CEDAW 民間影子報告發起者: 婦女新知基金會繼續主張多元性別納入 CEDAW
-
2023-10[公聽會發言] 🟠 反擴張派立法院公聽會: 性別工作平等法修法是否擴及自我認同性別發起者: 國教行動聯盟AABE 等團體反對「自我認同性別」進入工作平等法保護對象
-
2024[政策建議書] 🔵 擴張派婦女新知等 推動性平綱領第 6 版進一步擴張發起者: 婦女新知基金會預估推動進一步納入跨性別議題
-
2024📜 [政策綱領修訂] 🔴 軸四擴張行政院性平政策綱領 第 6 版修訂中(預估 2024-2025 公布)機關: GEC預估進一步擴張 SOGIESC 內容
-
2024📜 [修法] 🔴 軸四擴張行政院推動性別工作平等法擴及自我認同性別(草案)機關: MOL擴大保護對象至自我認同性別者
-
2024-04[政策建議書] 🟠 反擴張派AABE 國教盟 性教育課綱再校準公聽會發言發起者: 國教行動聯盟主張性教育以健康教育為主軸,反對性別運動主導
-
2024-09[政策建議書] 🔵 擴張派行政院性平處 性別平等政策綱領 v6 修訂發起者: 行政院性別平等處進一步擴張 SOGIESC 段落,本平台與護家護兒提交修訂意見書反對
-
2024-09[政策建議書] 🟠 反擴張派台灣全國媽媽護家護兒聯盟 對性平綱領第 6 版修訂意見書發起者: 台灣全國媽媽護家護兒聯盟反對性平綱領擴張,主張回歸 CEDAW 16 條結構
-
2026-04[影子報告提交] 🟠 反擴張派台灣全國媽媽護家護兒聯盟 第 5 次 CEDAW 影子報告(本平台)發起者: 台灣全國媽媽護家護兒聯盟反對 CEDAW 詮釋擴張,主張婦女實質權益優先
👥 結果評估:誰受益 / 誰受害
✅ 受益 — 同志與性別少數群體
對應政策: 行政院性別平等政策綱領 第 4 版(106 年修正)正式納入多元性別章節
評估期間: 2017-2024
證據: LGBT 議題政策語言密度顯著提升,公部門資源投入增加,同婚專法 2019 通過
反事實 (若無此政策): 若無 2017 綱領擴張,同婚專法可能無法在 2019 通過(政策語言鋪陳不足)
責任歸屬: 為擴張派倡議之直接受益群體;但本平台主張其權益應在獨立框架,不擠壓 CEDAW 婦女資源
❌ 受害 — 婦女實質權益(GPG / TFR / 家暴等指標族群)
對應政策: 行政院性別平等政策綱領 第 4 版(106 年修正)正式納入多元性別章節
評估期間: 2017-2024
證據: GPG、TFR、孕產婦死亡率 後 7 年顯著退步;同期性平處 SOGIESC 用語占比 8.1%(高於同期國際 CO 5.8%)
反事實 (若無此政策): 若 2017 綱領未納入多元性別章節,而是強化弱勢婦女章節,實質指標可能優於現況
責任歸屬: 婦女新知等擴張派 NGO 為主要倡議者;性平處為政策執行者;具體結果為婦女實質指標停滯/退步
✅ 受益 — 婦女實質權益(疫情女性失業 / 家暴 / 贍養 / 政治參與)
對應政策: —
評估期間: 2022
證據: 婦女新知 2022 平行報告聚焦疫情失業 / 家暴 / 贍養費 / 婦女保障名額,屬婦女實質權益議程
責任歸屬: 本案例為**反證(H₂)**:雖標記婦女新知整體 position_axis4=expand,但其特定行動可推婦女實質權益進步;不可整體標籤化
⚠ 有得有失 — 婦女實質權益
對應政策: 2018 公投第 14 案否決(民法同婚)、第 12 案通過(同婚另立專法)
評估期間: 2018-2024
證據: 公投結果迫使同婚走專法,客觀上將同性婚姻與民法婚姻框架分流;對 CEDAW 詮釋擴張之影響有限
責任歸屬: 反擴張派(全民護家盟)為主要倡議者;客觀效果為「框架分流」,可視為本平台主張之先例
🌐 國際 CEDAW 委員會評估
第 1 次審查 (2009) §sample-1
on sexual orientation and assistance for......
軸四: 第 1 次 sexual orientation 出現 2 處 — 在反歧視保護一般原則下
第 1 次審查 (2009) §3
The Republic of Korea has ratified the National Human Rights Commission Act and such act gives definition to discrimination against gender and other grounds. Nevertheless, such definition is not complete and in the last legislation the parliament attempted to introduce an overall anti-discrimination...
第 2 次審查 (2014) §22
The Review Committee is concerned about the lack of progress in the development of teaching materials at all levels on sexual orientation an d gender identities, as recommended by the International Group of Independent Experts on ICCPR and ICESCR. The Review Committee is also concerned that there is...
第 2 次審查 (2014) §33
The Review Com mittee is concerned at the lack of legal recognition of the diversity of families in the country and that only heterosexual marriages are recognized but not same sex unions or cohabiting partnerships. The Review Committee is also concerned about the lack o f statistical data on unregi...
第 2 次審查 (2014) §34
The Review Committee is concerned about the provisions of the 2008 Executive Order regulating the process of gender change and requiring inter alia, the surgical removal of reproductive organs before qualifying for registration. It is further concerned at the lack of statistical data on transgender ...
第 2 次審查 (2014) §6
The Review Committee is concerned that despite the guarantee of equality for all people in article 7 of the Constitution of Taiwan, there is no legal definition of discrimination against women. It is also concerned that there is no law addressing multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination aga...
第 3 次審查 (2018) §19
The IRC recommends that the Government: (a) improve indicators and conduct a broad study on the prevalence of stereotypes and wrongful application of law by pros ecutors and judges, as recommended in the second review ; (b) extend systematic and mandatory capacity-buildi ng on women’s human rights a...
第 3 次審查 (2018) §24
The IRC notes the existing, albeit rather limit ed, efforts to accelerate substantive equality of women and men by introducing various forms of te mporary special measures. The IRC also notes that the Executive Yuan sets “Gender Equ ality in Decision-Making of Public and Private Sectors” as an impor...
第 3 次審查 (2018) §29
The IRC recommends that the Government: (a) amend the Domestic Violence Prevention Act to s pecify gender based violence against women, in accordance with the CEDA W Committee’s General Recommendation No. 35 ; (b) raise awareness on online violence and develop measures against hate speech, which sho...
第 3 次審查 (2018) §46
The IRC is concerned that sexual harassment, as sault and bullying continue on school campuses, in particular against girls, students wit h disabilities, LBTI students and foreigners among others....
第 3 次審查 (2018) §47
The IRC urges the Government to step up its eff orts to prevent sexual harassment, 12 sexual assault and sexual bullying in schools, by providing strengthened policy measures and educational programs. The IRC recommends that s urveys are regularly conducted and analyzed, and proactive policy measure...
第 4 次審查 (2022) §46
The IRC recommends the Government to consider using temporary special measures in order to ensure at least one third of admissions for women, in highly segregated areas where they are underrepresented, and adopt action plans for combatting segregation and ensure continuation of integration and progr...
第 4 次審查 (2022) §64
The IRC recommends that the Government intensify its efforts to equip the hospitals and health clinics with the necessary equipment and facilities to meet the diverse health needs of women with disabilities. It furth er recommends the Government to provide women with disabilities with increased educ...
第 4 次審查 (2022) §77
The IRC recommends that in cases of divorc e that involves domestic violence, mediation should be prohibited. It further recommends that all mediation committee members undergo training on domestic violence and be instructed to refrain from pressing women into mediation under all circumstances. It a...
第 4 次審查 (2022) §78
The IRC appreciates that the 2019 Act for Implementation of Juridical Yuan Interpretation No. 748 allows same-sex marriages to be legally registered in Taiwan. It notes that Article 20 of the Act retains a distinction between same -sex marriage and heterosexual marriage, and that transnational same ...
第 4 次審查 (2022) §79
The IRC calls upon the Government to consider taking the necessary measures to eliminate all remaining discriminatory rules again same-sex couples. De-facto unions...
📜 政府 / 官網文件原文證據(共 26 段)
由本平台從 cedaw.org.tw / gec.ey.gov.tw 等官網爬取 + 智慧抽取(Wave 93-98)。每段標註來源文件、機構、年份。
📚 方法論透明
本追溯鏈以「假設驗證」(hypothesis testing) 方法論建構 — 不預設結論,而是讓三種假設並列:
- H₁ 擴張派錯誤論(本平台立場待證):擴張派倡議導致婦女實質權益退步
- H₀ 無關論(虛無假設):擴張與退步無因果
- H₂ 反向論(對立方主張):擴張實質提升婦女與多元群體權益
因果強度分 4 級:🟢 強(direct)/ 🟡 中(contributory)/ 🔴 弱(context)/ ❌ 反證
🌐 跨公約觀點 — 此議題與其他公約的交集
本議題在三公約共構分析中被識別為跨公約交織議題,建議參照其他公約的政府論述以避免單一視角盲點:
- 📌 LGBTQI+ 兒少 (CEDAW × CRC) →此議題在 兒少 CRC 也有相關政府文件 / 倡議,可交叉檢視論述差異。
資料來源:三公約交織議題完整對照