📅 時間軸
-
2013-10[法案推動] 🔵 擴張派伴侶盟 民法修正草案(同婚)立法院一讀發起者: 台灣伴侶權益推動聯盟推動同婚合法化(2013 首次進入立法院議程)
-
2017-05-24[CO 段落要求] 🔵 擴張派司法院釋字第 748 號公布:同性婚姻違憲發起者: 台灣伴侶權益推動聯盟釋憲要求 2 年內修法給予同性婚姻法律地位
-
2017-05-24📜 [判決] 🔴 軸四擴張司法院釋字第 748 號:民法婚姻章節不含同性婚違憲機關: JY釋憲庭認定同性婚姻不被民法保障違憲
-
2018-11-24[法案推動] 🟠 反擴張派2018 公投第 14 案(同婚以民法保障)否決發起者: 全民護家盟反同婚陣營主導之公投否決民法同婚,但通過第 12 案專法保障
-
2018-11-24📜 [判決] 🟢 軸四縮減2018 公投第 14 案否決(民法同婚)、第 12 案通過(同婚另立專法)機關: CEC反同婚陣營公投獲勝,但同婚仍須依釋字 748 立法
-
2019-03-08[政策建議書] 🟠 反擴張派WHRC Declaration on Women's Sex-Based Rights 全球連署啟動發起者: WHRC 婦女人權運動(國際)sex-based rights 國際立場聲明,9 條對應 CEDAW + 婦女空間 + 體育 + 兒童醫療
-
2019-05-24[法案推動] 🔵 擴張派司法院釋字 748 號施行法 立法院三讀通過發起者: 台灣伴侶權益推動聯盟同婚合法化,改變家庭定義範圍
-
2019-05-24📜 [立法] 🔴 軸四擴張司法院釋字第 748 號解釋施行法(同婚專法)機關: MOJ台灣成為亞洲第一個同婚合法化國家;改變家庭定義範圍
-
2026-04[影子報告提交] 🟠 反擴張派台灣全國媽媽護家護兒聯盟 第 5 次 CEDAW 影子報告(本平台)發起者: 台灣全國媽媽護家護兒聯盟反對 CEDAW 詮釋擴張,主張婦女實質權益優先
👥 結果評估:誰受益 / 誰受害
✅ 受益 — 同性配偶(雙方為生理女性者亦含在內)
對應政策: 司法院釋字第 748 號解釋施行法(同婚專法)
評估期間: 2019-2024
證據: 逾 1.2 萬對同性配偶在台合法登記,其中含同性女性配偶及其子女家庭結構;國際排名亞洲第一同婚合法
反事實 (若無此政策): 若無 748 釋憲與 2019 立法,同性配偶在台無法律地位,涉繼承 / 醫療簽署 / 收養 等權益受限
責任歸屬: 為擴張派直接受益群體;**本平台對同性婚姻當事人雙方為生理女性者納入 CEDAW 保護不反對**
🌐 國際 CEDAW 委員會評估
第 1 次審查 (2009) §2
Currently, the trend is to consolidate the laws regarding discrimination against race, sex and disability into a unified one. The establishment of National Human Rights Institution is another phenomenon that has gained popularity internationally....
第 2 次審查 (2014) §19
While commending the ‘one -third principle’ on women’s representation and 9 recognizing the increased representation of women at the Central Level, the Review Committee is concerned that the proportion of the women in the Judicial Yuan, in particular in the Constitutional Court and serving as Grand ...
第 2 次審查 (2014) §30
The Review Committee is deeply concerned that rural women are not invited to participate in the elaboration and implementation of the national or local rural development plan s. It is also concerned that the percentage of women in the decision-making po sitions of the Farmers ’ Association, Fisherme...
第 2 次審查 (2014) §32
The Review Committee confirms the multiple forms of discrimination experienced by women with disabilities, especially those with intellectual disabilities, who suffer multiple forms of discrimination. It is concerned that there is no comprehensive data on women with disabilities disaggregated by age...
第 3 次審查 (2018) §17
The IRC recommends that the Government: (a) increase the number of courts serving women in rural and remote areas, including small islands, and also urgently increase the number of judges, especially in the family courts; (b) provide a comprehensive and sustainable legal a id that is responsive to t...
第 3 次審查 (2018) §33
The IRC recommends that the Government: (a) ensure the effective implementation of the exis ting measures to further increase representation of women in political and p ublic life, in particular in decision-making at all levels, and leadership posit ions in public and private institutions and compan...
第 3 次審查 (2018) §34
While acknowledging that the draft amendment to some provisions of the Immigration Act was prepared by the Executive Yuan in August 20 16, which is expected to bring some relaxation of the restrictions on the residency and visitation right to children of the divorced immigrant women, the IRC is conc...
第 3 次審查 (2018) §36
The IRC is concerned that the new immigrant wom en who are widows of deceased veterans are faced with eviction from the public ho using upon their husbands’ death and the expiration of the limited 11 years’ residency perio d. Many of them do not qualify for other benefits because they do not have ch...
第 3 次審查 (2018) §37
The IRC recommends that the Government address the situation of marriage immigrants who are dependent on their husbands, inc luding in particular housing situation of those who married with veterans, and take measures to protect their right to security of tenure and basic social security. Stateless ...
第 3 次審查 (2018) §42
The IRC is concerned that the disadvantaged gro ups of girls are not provided with the equal opportunity for education. Girls with disabil ities in special education are far less than the number of boys with disabilities at all levels of education. The IRC is further concerned that the data does not...
第 3 次審查 (2018) §64
The IRC welcomes the Government’s efforts in de veloping a number of social protection measures and a National Pension Insurance. Likewise , the IRC appreciates the Government’s initiatives for the economic empowerment of women s uch as the “Phoenix Micro Start-Up Loan” micro-credit programs. Howeve...
第 3 次審查 (2018) §65
The IRC recommends that the Government: (a) revise its national welfare strategy with a foc us on the most disadvantaged and marginalized groups of women, particularly olde r, rural, indigenous women and women with disabilities ensuring that it is ful ly inclusive and encourage the active participat...
第 3 次審查 (2018) §69
The IRC draws the Government’s attention to the CEDAW Committee’s General Recommendation No. 37 on the gender-related dimensi ons of disaster risk reduction in the context of climate change and recommends the Go vernment to ensure the effective participation of women, in particular rural and ind ige...
第 4 次審查 (2022) §13
As indicated by the IRC of the Third CEDAW Review and in the written submission of Independent Opinion of the NHRC, there is a lack of data and no protection of the rights of disadvantaged groups of women, such as women with disabilities, rural women, immigrant women, indigenous women, middle- aged ...
第 4 次審查 (2022) §14
Taiwan is an island country, prone to be very affected by climate change. The government needs to formulate its mitigation and adaptation policies, from the gender perspective with particular a ttention paid to women in rural areas, with the inclusion of gender impact assessment and with the partici...
第 4 次審查 (2022) §42
The IRC recommends that elected women legisl ators consider forming a cross -party Women’s Caucus in the Legislative Yuan to initiate and enhance the passage of CEDAW-adapted legislation and gender equality policies in diverse areas. Equality and self-determination of new women immigrants...
第 4 次審查 (2022) §43
The IRC acknowledges the revisions made to the Nationality Act of 2016 to protect the rights and interests of new women immigrants. However, it also notes that higher proportion of women’s application for naturalization are rejected on the basis of the “no bad conduct” criteria, which negatively imp...
第 4 次審查 (2022) §44
The IRC recommends that the Government: (a) define ”bad conduct” in precise legal terms and ensure its application in a non -gender biased manner; (b) provide awareness -raising education to empower new women immigrants and offer appropriate psycho-social and other necessary serv ices, and take step...
第 4 次審查 (2022) §66
The IRC recommends that the Government inte nsify its efforts to change stereotypical behaviour in the sports and recreation fields and promote female presence on all levels within sports and media covering sports. It further recommends that the Government make sure that women and men have equal acc...
第 4 次審查 (2022) §67
The IRC commends the Government for the various measures taken to enhance economic opportunities for rural and indigenous women and their participation in decision -making institutions and associations. The IRC is nonetheless concerned about the lack of adequate infrastructure and economic opportuni...
第 4 次審查 (2022) §68
The IRC, drawing the attention of the Government to the CEDAW General Recommendation No 34 on rural women, recommends that Government: (a) establish mechanisms for private sector gender mainstreaming to accelerate progress toward equality in rural areas, consider the introduction of innovative model...
📜 政府 / 官網文件原文證據(共 17 段)
由本平台從 cedaw.org.tw / gec.ey.gov.tw 等官網爬取 + 智慧抽取(Wave 93-98)。每段標註來源文件、機構、年份。
📚 方法論透明
本追溯鏈以「假設驗證」(hypothesis testing) 方法論建構 — 不預設結論,而是讓三種假設並列:
- H₁ 擴張派錯誤論(本平台立場待證):擴張派倡議導致婦女實質權益退步
- H₀ 無關論(虛無假設):擴張與退步無因果
- H₂ 反向論(對立方主張):擴張實質提升婦女與多元群體權益
因果強度分 4 級:🟢 強(direct)/ 🟡 中(contributory)/ 🔴 弱(context)/ ❌ 反證