This page condenses the core findings from Wave 100-130 cross-platform analysis. Each structural finding is a "should-appear-but-missing" gap in government discourse, surfaced only by cross-referencing 102,728 segments across 3 platforms. Click any PI chip to jump to the scorecard + action plan for that issue.
ββFinding 1: Disabled women β invisible in CRPD documents
π΄ criticalViolates CEDAW GR-18 + CRPD Article 6
β Finding 2: Domestic violence absent from CRPD
π severeDisabled women's intersectional violence has no government discourse
π§Finding 3: "Reasonable accommodation" paradox
π severeCRPD's flagship concept appears 7Γ in CRPD docs vs 173 in CRC and 100 in CEDAW
πFinding 4: SOGIESC: 100Γ concentration in CEDAW
π΄ criticalLGBTI/gender-identity discourse overwhelmingly framed within women's rights, not children's or disability
βFinding 5: Disabled indigenous: total invisibility
π΄ critical0 segments across all 3 covenants β triple-disadvantage population unrecognized
β»βFinding 6: LGBTQI+ children: low across all covenants
π΄ criticalCEDAW 2 / CRC 1 / CRPD 0 β sensitive intersection lacks systematic government framing
π΄ critical = lowest-platform 0 segments (complete structural blind spot) Β· π severe = 1-9 segments (high deficit) Β· π‘ deficit = 10-50 segments (moderate deficit) Β· β noted = 50+ segments (baseline discourse exists)