Blog Case Studies Index

From Deep Analysis to Monthly Tracking, Then Self-Quantification

All Tri-Covenant Watch case studies. "6 Structural Findings Deep-Dive" (6 pieces) + "Methodology Coda" (7th piece) = 7 case studies.

This platform spans three NGOs and three years of accumulated 102,728 government-document segments full-text indexed. The 6 cross-covenant structural findings are the platform's core output, covering disabled women's violence, reasonable accommodation paradox, disabled indigenous, SOGIESC concentration, LGBTQI+ children. Each finding has a corresponding deep-dive case study (6 pieces); after the series, a "methodology coda" was added (7th piece: how the platform audits itself) β€” totaling 7 ZH + 7 EN case studies. Next: deep analysis + self-quantification feed into monthly action tracking.

🎯 6 Structural Findings Deep-Dive Series

2026-05-06 Β· 6 pieces complete Β· CC BY 4.0
First case study Β· Overview102,728 segments

"Reasonable Accommodation" Appears 7 Times in 3,493 CRPD Documents

Overview of all 6 structural findings. Three NGOs, three years, 102,728 government-document segments cross-referenced β€” surfacing six "government silence" patterns. Why does CRPD's flagship concept appear least in disability documents? Why is disabled women / disabled indigenous discourse zero?

δΈ­ζ–‡ English

Second case study Β· Finding #3CRPD 7 / CRC 173 / CEDAW 100

The "Reasonable Accommodation" Paradox: Why CRPD's Flagship Concept Is Least Mentioned in Disability Documents

CRPD Article 2's flagship concept appears LESS in disability documents than in women's or children's. Three hypotheses (volume / administrative-process / translation), most likely explanation: disability convention still in "administrative tasks" phase, not yet "rights discourse" phase. Mapped to PI-12.

δΈ­ζ–‡ English β†’ PI-12 (CRPD)

Third case study Β· Finding #53 covenants total: 1 segment

Disabled Indigenous: The Population Forgotten by All Three Covenants

3 covenants combined: 1 segment (CRPD 0 / CRC 1 / CEDAW 0). Australia NDIS, Canada PALS, New Zealand Whaikaha Ministry β€” international frameworks established. Taiwan disabled indigenous: 0 government discourse. Mapped to CRPD PI-19 + CEDAW PI-15.

δΈ­ζ–‡ English β†’ PI-19

Fourth case study Β· Findings #1+#2170,000 cases vs 0 segments

Violence Against Disabled Women: EU 34%, UN 2-4Γ—, Taiwan Government Documents 0

EU FRA 34% / UN Women 2-4Γ— / Australia 2Γ— violence rate. Taiwan estimated 170,000 disabled women / 12 months exposed to violence, but CRPD government documents have 0 segments and 1 segment on DV. CRPD Β§6 + Β§16 + GC-3 and CEDAW GR-19 / GR-35 obligations all unmet. Mapped to PI-17.

δΈ­ζ–‡ English β†’ PI-17

Fifth case study Β· Finding #4CEDAW 1,403 / CRC 362 / CRPD 0

SOGIESC 100Γ— Concentrated in CEDAW: Why Does the Women's Framework Carry All Gender-Identity Discourse?

SOGIESC discourse 100Γ— concentrated in CEDAW women's framework; disabled LGBTQI+ entirely silenced. Four hypotheses: CEDAW Axis 4 active tracking / gender-equality machinery monopoly / CRC political sensitivity / CRPD lacks LGBTQI+ advocates. Cost: disabled LGBTQI+ falls through three layers. Mapped to PI-18 + PI-14.

δΈ­ζ–‡ English β†’ PI-18

Sixth (final) case study Β· Finding #63 covenants: 3 segments

LGBTQI+ Children: Low Across All Three Covenants, No One Claims Them

CEDAW 2 / CRC 1 / CRPD 0 (strict intersection: 3 segments total). CRC GC-22 (2017) explicitly mandates protection but Taiwan children's-rights government documents don't carry it. Three reasons: political sensitivity detour / gender-equality machinery absorbing SOGIESC / internal CRC NGO tension. Series summary: "those who should claim, no one claims." Mapped to PI-14 + PI-18.

δΈ­ζ–‡ English β†’ PI-14

🩺 Methodology Coda (7th piece)

Wave 167 Β· 2026-05-06 Β· CC BY 4.0

Methodology coda following the six findings. The platform quantifies government silence β€” and quantifies its own. The link_audit result becomes the 7th KPI in the monthly tracker, putting structural critique under structural self-discipline.

Seventh (methodology coda) case study88 β†’ 50 dead_anchor (43% repair)

How Does a Platform That Audits Government Audit Itself?

3-platform baseline: 88 dead_anchors. By Wave 165: 50. Three key fixes: CRPD 102-page #main backfill (-102) / CEDAW templates removed (-2) / 4 invisible homepage anchors (-38). Wave 166 promoted dead_anchor as the 7th indicator on the monthly tracker (Platform Health, baseline 50 β†’ target 0 by 2027-Q1). Silence is bidirectional β€” the only difference is who admits first.

δΈ­ζ–‡ English β†’ QA Β· Link Audit Dashboard β†’ 7th indicator

πŸ“… Next phase: Monthly Action Tracking

With the series complete, the platform shifts from deep analysis to monthly numerical tracking. Each month-start snapshot now includes "6 structural findings indicator monitoring," watching:

Monthly trend reports start July 2026. πŸ“ˆ Subscribe to monthly trend Β· πŸ“‘ RSS Β· Atom

πŸ“‘ Subscribe to platform updates (media / academics / NGO advocates): RSS cedaw-watch/feed.xml Β· Atom cedaw-watch/atom.xml. New case studies and monthly snapshots auto-pushed.